Earth observation guideKinds of data

Radar interferometry

Comparing the phase of two radar images measures how far the ground has moved, to within millimetres.

The basics

Imagine measuring the distance to a wall with a ruler marked only in wavelengths, but able to read the fraction of a wavelength between the marks. Measure twice, subtract, and any movement of the wall shows up even if it is tiny. Radar interferometry, called InSAR, does this from space. It compares two radar images of the same place taken at different times and measures how far the ground has moved towards or away from the satellite, to within a fraction of the radar wavelength, which for a C band satellite is a few millimetres. It has shown towns sinking as groundwater is pumped, volcanoes swelling before an eruption, slopes creeping before a landslide, and the ground shifting across tens of kilometres in an earthquake.

Why it matters

Ground that moves a few millimetres a year is invisible in any single picture, yet it matters to anyone responsible for buildings, railways, mines, dams or pipelines. Interferometry measures that motion over wide areas with nobody on site, and repeated over months it shows whether a slope, a town or a structure is settling, swelling or creeping.

First visitLater visitgroundsank
Between two visits the ground sank a little, so the path to it is a fraction of a wave longer. The satellite measures that fraction. The motion is exaggerated here.

In depth

Each radar pixel records the amplitude of the echo and also its phase. For a target at slant range RR, the round trip adds a phase proportional to RR measured in wavelengths, with the factor of two for the double path included, plus a contribution φs\varphi_{s} from how the scatterers in the pixel combine.

φ=4πλ R+φs\varphi = \frac{4\pi}{\lambda}\,R + \varphi_{s}
(1)

where φ\varphi is the phase of the pixel, in rad\mathrm{rad}; λ\lambda is the radar wavelength, in m\mathrm{m}; RR is the slant range to the target, in m\mathrm{m}; and φs\varphi_{s} is the phase added by the way the scatterers within the pixel combine, in rad\mathrm{rad}.

The scattering term is random from pixel to pixel but is the same on both dates if the surface has not changed, so subtracting the phases of two images cancels it. What remains, the interferogram phase, is the sum of several parts [1, 2, 3].

Δφ=φflat+φtopo+φdefo+φatm+φnoise\Delta\varphi = \varphi_{\mathrm{flat}} + \varphi_{\mathrm{topo}} + \varphi_{\mathrm{defo}} + \varphi_{\mathrm{atm}} + \varphi_{\mathrm{noise}}
(2)

where every term is a phase in rad\mathrm{rad}; Δφ\Delta\varphi is the interferogram phase, the difference between the phases of the two images; φflat\varphi_{\mathrm{flat}} is the flat-Earth phase, from viewing a smooth reference surface from two positions; φtopo\varphi_{\mathrm{topo}} is the topographic phase, from the height of the ground; φdefo\varphi_{\mathrm{defo}} is the deformation phase, from movement of the ground along the line of sight; φatm\varphi_{\mathrm{atm}} is the atmospheric phase, from the change in signal delay between the dates; and φnoise\varphi_{\mathrm{noise}} is the noise, from decorrelation and the instrument.

The flat-Earth term is computed from the orbits and removed. The topographic term arises because the two passes view the ground from slightly different positions, separated by the baseline shown in Figure 1, and it grows with the component of the baseline perpendicular to the line of sight B⊥B_\perp and the height of the point hh.

φtopo=4πλ B⊥ hRsin⁡ θ\varphi_{\mathrm{topo}} = \frac{4\pi}{\lambda}\,\frac{B_\perp\,h}{R\sin\,\theta}
(3)

where φtopo\varphi_{\mathrm{topo}} is the topographic phase, in rad\mathrm{rad}; λ\lambda is the radar wavelength, in m\mathrm{m}; B⊥B_\perp is the perpendicular baseline, the component of the separation between the two orbit positions at right angles to the line of sight, in m\mathrm{m}; hh is the height of the point above the reference surface, in m\mathrm{m}; RR is the slant range, in m\mathrm{m}; and θ\theta is the incidence angle, between the radar beam and the vertical at the ground.

Subtracting a terrain model removes it, leaving the term of interest. If the ground moves by dd along the line of sight between the two dates, the range changes by the same amount.

φdefo=4πλ d\varphi_{\mathrm{defo}} = \frac{4\pi}{\lambda}\,d
(4)

where φdefo\varphi_{\mathrm{defo}} is the deformation phase, in rad\mathrm{rad}; λ\lambda is the radar wavelength, in m\mathrm{m}; and dd is the displacement of the ground along the line of sight between the two dates, in m\mathrm{m}, positive away from the radar.

One full cycle of phase, a fringe in the colour image, therefore corresponds to a motion of half a wavelength, 2.77 cm at the 5.55 cm wavelength of Sentinel-1, as the second panel of Figure 1 shows. Phase is known only modulo 2π2\pi, so the fringes have to be counted, or unwrapped, to turn them into total motion. A phase precision of a tenth of a cycle corresponds to a range change of under 3 mm at that wavelength [1, 2].

(a) Two passes, one baseline

R₁R₂BB⊥First passSecond passdground point

(b) One fringe is half a wavelength

dPhase0λ/2λ3λ/22ππ0
  • d the ground's motion along the line of sight between the passes, drawn exaggerated
  • In (b) the horizontal axis is d, and the colours repeat once per fringe, as on an interferogram
Figure 1. Radar interferometry. (a) Two passes over the same ground separated by a baseline BB, with B⊥B_\perp its component perpendicular to the line of sight. (b) Interferogram phase repeats every half wavelength of motion along the line of sight.

Three things limit the method. The two images must stay coherent, meaning that the scattering term is unchanged, and vegetation, snow and ploughing destroy it over time, so it works best on buildings, rock and bare ground. Water vapour changes the signal delay between the dates and adds the atmospheric term, which is why single interferograms are not enough for the smallest motions. And a large perpendicular baseline decorrelates the signal. Time-series methods address the second and third by selecting stable scatterers or small-baseline pairs and combining many images, which brings the precision of the slow motion down to millimetres per year [4, 5, 6]. The first radar map of an earthquake's displacement field was of the 1992 Landers earthquake [7], and the idea of mapping small elevation changes by differencing interferograms had been set out a few years earlier [8].

References

  1. Bamler, R. and Hartl, P. (1998) Synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Inverse Problems, 14(4), R1-R54. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/14/4/001
  2. Massonnet, D. and Feigl, K. L. (1998) Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth's surface. Reviews of Geophysics, 36(4), 441-500. https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG03139
  3. Rosen, P., Hensley, S., Joughin, I. et al. (2000) Synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Proceedings of the IEEE, 88(3), 333-382. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.838084
  4. Ferretti, A., Prati, C. and Rocca, F. (2001) Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(1), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.898661
  5. Berardino, P., Fornaro, G., Lanari, R. and Sansosti, E. (2002) A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(11), 2375-2383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.803792
  6. Hooper, A., Zebker, H., Segall, P. and Kampes, B. (2004) A new method for measuring deformation on volcanoes and other natural terrains using InSAR persistent scatterers. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021737
  7. Massonnet, D., Rossi, M., Carmona, C. et al. (1993) The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar interferometry. Nature, 364(6433), 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1038/364138a0
  8. Gabriel, A. K., Goldstein, R. M. and Zebker, H. A. (1989) Mapping small elevation changes over large areas: Differential radar interferometry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 94(B7), 9183-9191. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB07p09183